Monthly Archives: February 2011

RayTracker Acquired By First Solar

With the cur­rent state of the econ­omy in a sham­bles, most econ­o­mists say the only way out is to rebuild …Read the Rest

Climate Change

FedEx CEO Calls for the End to Our Oil Dependency

http://money.cnn.com/2011/02/01/technology/frederick_smith_energy.fortune/

In a to-the-point Op-Ed in the online edi­tion of For­tune Mag­a­zine, FedEx CEO Fred­er­ick Smith calls for “a truly bipar­ti­san solu­tion to our oil depen­dence” that involves replac­ing the exist­ing fleet of oil-consuming vehi­cles with elec­tric cars and trucks.  He’s absolutely right, and it is high time for Con­gress to act.

As the head of FedEx, Smith knows some­thing about oil depen­dence: every­day FedEx puts 670 air­craft into the skies (fly­ing half-a-million miles each day) and over 70,000 other motor­ized vehi­cles — nearly all of which con­sume oil.  But give him credit — for unlike some who sim­ply cry for us to “drill, baby, drill” — Smith acknowl­edges that this is sim­ply not sus­tain­able.  Rather, the solu­tion he pro­poses is leg­is­la­tion that would encour­age the deploy­ment of EVs at a vastly accel­er­ated pace:

What we need to pro­tect our nation is the envi­ron­ment to cre­ate in a few short years an entirely new trans­porta­tion sys­tem with mil­lions, and then tens of mil­lions, of elec­tric cars and trucks.

And there is a way to make it hap­pen – pass a bill to pro­mote elec­tric vehi­cles. Last sum­mer Repub­li­cans and Democ­rats on the Sen­ate Energy Com­mit­tee voted in favor of a plan to assist the deploy­ment of elec­tric vehi­cles and infra­struc­ture in the U.S. The bill, which still hasn’t passed, was based in part on pol­icy rec­om­men­da­tions by the Elec­tri­fi­ca­tion Coali­tion, a group of which I am a mem­ber. It calls for the cre­ation of elec­tri­fi­ca­tion “deploy­ment com­mu­ni­ties”: regions where incen­tives would sup­port elec­tri­fi­ca­tion at scale. It lever­ages con­strained fed­eral resources in a market-friendly way by encour­ag­ing com­mu­ni­ties to work with major employ­ers, util­i­ties, and other stake­hold­ers to find the most cost-effective path­ways to electrification.

Read­ers of this blog know well that we are huge sup­port­ers of EVs. Leg­is­la­tion at the national level that would encour­age the pro­duc­tion and deploy­ment of EVs should also pro­mote solar and other renew­able energy sources at the same time. It is a nat­ural fit — renew­ables like solar can fuel EVs so that there are zero emis­sions asso­ci­ated with the miles trav­eled and a solar power instal­la­tion will con­tinue to pro­vide the energy needed to fuel that EV for 25 years or more.

We encour­age you to read the entire piece (link at the head­line of this post) and share your thoughts in the comments.

On a related note, here is an inter­view with Nis­san CEO Car­los Ghosn dis­cussing the ris­ing cost of oil and how that is dri­ving demand for the all-electric Leaf.

Feb 7, Solar Power Grants In US And Other Countries in 2011

How to get solar power grants to help you finance your invest­ments in solar energy

Solar Economics

SunShot” Aims to Drive Down the Cost of Solar Power

The U.S. Depart­ment of Energy (DOE) today announced its plan — dubbed “Sun­Shot” — to drive down the cost of solar power over the next decade — includ­ing in so-called “soft costs” related to per­mit­ting and inter­con­nec­tion. Over­all, the goal is to drive down costs by 75% over the next ten years, mak­ing large-scale solar cost-competitive even with­out incen­tives.
From the DOE press release:

Sun­Shot will work to bring down the full cost of solar — includ­ing the costs of the solar cells and instal­la­tion — by focus­ing on four main pillars:

  • Tech­nolo­gies for solar cells and arrays that con­vert sun­light to energy;
  • Elec­tron­ics that opti­mize the per­for­mance of the installation;
  • Improve­ments in the effi­ciency of solar man­u­fac­tur­ing processes;
  • Instal­la­tion, design and per­mit­ting for solar energy systems.

For more infor­ma­tion and to fol­low the initiative’s progress, visit the Sun­Shot Ini­tia­tive web­page.

We are cer­tainly in favor of any­thing that helps drive down the cost of solar power — and har­mo­niz­ing the presently dis­cor­dant rules and reg­u­la­tions gov­ern­ing solar instal­la­tions from utility-to-utility and city-to-city would be a great step for­ward.  (For a sam­ple of what that dis­cord sounds like today, check out our ear­lier post on the state of util­ity pro­grams here in South­ern Cal­i­for­nia.)

Nev­er­the­less, it is some­what per­verse that the oil and gas indus­tries con­tinue to receive bil­lions of dol­lars in sub­si­dies, but renew­ables — par­tic­u­larly solar — are expected to demon­strate that they are “cost-competitive” with­out any sub­si­dies at all!  That is a fun­da­men­tally wrong-headed approach.

We sup­port Pres­i­dent Obama’s call dur­ing his State of the Union Speech to elim­i­nate all sub­si­dies for the fos­sil fuel indus­tries.  But while we wait for that sunny day to dawn, we also sup­port the intro­duc­tion of a ratio­nal, feed-in-tariff that would pro­vide long-term price sup­ports for renew­able energy — as opposed to the chaotic and cacoph­o­nous nature of the exist­ing rebate incen­tive structure.

There are intel­li­gent leg­isla­tive pro­pos­als out there now. Wash­ing­ton — Sacra­mento — are you listening?

Electric Cars that Run on Sun

Unrest in the Middle East — Yet Another Reason to Switch to Solar Power

As we wit­ness events unfold­ing in Egypt and else­where through­out the Mid­dle East we are struck by the desire of peo­ple every­where to be free and to live lives of hope and self-determination.  But here at home we are reminded that insta­bil­ity in the Mid­dle East means higher energy prices — both directly at the pump, and indi­rectly in the form of mil­i­tary and other costs asso­ci­ated with pre­serv­ing the con­tin­ual flow of oil com­ing to these shores. It is not a sus­tain­able future, and as Amer­i­cans we need to rethink how we fuel our lives.

Every­day nearly 3 mil­lion bar­rels of oil flow through the Egyptian-controlled Suez Canal, an amount equal to Canada’s entire daily oil pro­duc­tion. Much of that oil is des­tined for the United States, which imports nearly 6 mil­lion bar­rels of OPEC oil each and every day.  As the wid­get to the right shows, oil prices are on the rise again, above $90/bbl as this is writ­ten.  If the sit­u­a­tion in Egypt dete­ri­o­rates to the point of dis­rupt­ing the flow of oil through the Suez Canal, oil prices will likely spike to all-time highs.

It sim­ply doesn’t have to be this way.

The new gen­er­a­tion of EVs — like the Nis­san Leaf - and plug-in hybrids — like the Chevy Volt - have the poten­tial to lead the way to a new future of energy inde­pen­dence.  Com­bine them with a solar power sys­tem of your own, and your energy sav­ings really mount up.

Let’s look at an exam­ple.  Take a Leaf with its 24 kWh bat­tery pack.  It is adver­tised to get roughly 100 miles per charge, but let’s be con­ser­v­a­tive here and assume that it only gets 80.  More­over, we will assume that our charg­ing sys­tem is only 90% effi­cient so to fully charge that 24 kWh bat­tery pack will actu­ally require 26 kWh of energy.  At SCE’s top-tiered rate of $0.325/kWh, our Leaf costs 10.8¢/mile to power.  Com­pare that to the aver­age gasoline-powered car on the high­way today.  That vehi­cle, accord­ing to the Bureau of Trans­porta­tion Sta­tis­tics, aver­ages 22.6 miles/gallon.  For gaso­line priced at $3.50/gallon, that aver­age car on the road today costs 15.5¢/mile to fuel. Let oil prices spike, and gaso­line prices climb to $4.00/gallon (cer­tainly well within the realm of pos­si­bil­ity) and that cost per mile goes to 17.7¢.  That means if you drive 10,000 miles per year, your fuel cost alone in that typ­i­cal Amer­i­can car will be $1,770/year and the Leaf — even using the most expen­sive elec­tric­ity in SCE ter­ri­tory, will save you $690/year.

Now what if you pow­ered that Leaf not from SCE’s Tier-5 elec­tric­ity, but with solar power from a Run on Sun solar sys­tem? Assume that you installed a 5 kW sys­tem that cost $6.00/Watt to install (a rea­son­able cost).  That sys­tem would cost $30,000 to install. After rebates (from the util­ity) and a 30% fed­eral tax credit, and the out-of-pocket cost is roughly 1/2 of that ini­tial cost — say $15,000.  That means that the sav­ings from dri­ving 10,000 miles/year will pay for your solar power sys­tem in eight and a half years.  But dur­ing those years you will con­tribute zero pol­lu­tion to the envi­ron­ment and never have to stop at a gas sta­tion again.

This is the way for­ward. This is the way to insu­late our­selves from polit­i­cal insta­bil­ity while at the same time clear­ing our air and dras­ti­cally reduc­ing our green­house gas emissions.

For years detrac­tors could say this wasn’t real­is­tic — that the vehi­cles didn’t exist or that the eco­nom­ics didn’t pen­cil out. Those days are over.  The future requires a new way of think­ing that will turn us away from the failed prac­tices of the past.

Feb 1, Portfolio 16″ Solar LED Landscape Walk Lighting

This pur­chase was my first endeavor into the solar pow­ered land­scape light­ing mar­ket. I went to my local Lowe’s store and pur­chased 6 pieces of the Portfolio

Envision Solar Installs Solar for Parking Project

Envision Solar Installs Solar for Parking Project

Envi­sion Solar Inter­na­tional has announced the design and instal­la­tion of its Solar Tree park­ing struc­tures at the new Ecotech Insti­tute, …Read the Rest

DayStar Technologies puts <span class="caps">CIGS</span> on Glass

DayStar Technologies puts CIGS on Glass

DayStar has been an indus­try leader in the devel­op­ment of thin film copper-indium-gallium-di-selenide solar pho­to­voltaics, com­monly known as a CIGS …Read the Rest

Page 4 of 4«1234